Review: Web Hosting Pal
I’m going to try an experiment. I signed up for a ReviewMe account to see if it’s a viable source of, well, coffee money (cuz let’s face it, I don’t blog often enough to consider this a career option). My first paid review will be of a Web Hosting review service called Web Hosting Pal.
For the record, I’m really glad ReviewMe doesn’t require positive reviews. I’m sorry Web Hosting Pal, I’m really trying to find something positive about your site, but I’m left wanting. So perhaps you can consider this constructive criticism.
Value Proposition
Web Hosting Pal’s value proposition is simple: they provide reviews of web hosts. As an idea, it’s a good one. Their execution of the idea though… well…
Each review is pretty lengthy and looks more like marketese than an unbiased review. This is bad, because marketese is “detested” by users. It gets worse too. The review is littered with underlined red text (underlining non-link text is bad bad bad!) Choice sentences are in bold, though they aren’t good summary sentences. And all that text becomes a sea of gray with blobs of red and blue.
But to their credit, there’s a table in the left column that lists the web host’s details. Tables of data are useful when making comparisons like this. Web Hosting Pal does provide such a table for their top 10 rated web hosts, but it doesn’t contain a great deal of information, nor do they allow you to customize what’s being compared. Again, it comes off more like marketese than objective data.
Perhaps the site is new, but there isn’t much content on it right now. As I write this, I count only eight reviews. They don’t even include my web host, Dreamhost, which is a fairly popular one (they even have a Wikipedia entry!).
New content seems to come from the site’s writers and external readers, which they solicit through a a contact form. I hope they’re able to get some reviews this way. Or that they write up some reviews soon.
There’s also a three-section beginner’s guide on web hosting basics, domain name basics, and email hosting. Unfortunately, none of these sections have any content yet. Just a big, “Sorry this page is updating….” message.
Meta Information
According to Alexa, they’ve been around since Jan. 26, 2003. Since that time, they’ve been able to earn a Google PageRank of 4. Since there’s so little content, I’m guessing the site has undergone a major redesign recently, or perhaps changed owners.
A peek at Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine shows that this design has been up since Oct. 29, 2005. Okay, so they haven’t had a major redesign recently. New owners? Or have they just sat on the site & its spare content since then? That would make me wonder why they’ve gotten a ReviewMe account.
How They Look
In a word: unprofessional. Very 2005. The site does not look trust-worthy at all. In fact, it reeks of sleaze, like some guy in a basement somewhere threw this up just to harvest your email or get you to randomly click on hidden ads or something. There’s even a misspelling in the heading, “Do You Know That You Can Host Multiple Websites On One Wosting Account Now!” It’s “Hosting” not “Wosting”. (I realize the misspelling may be intentional though, for SEO reasons.)
The client-side code isn’t even optimized for search engines. No use of web standard HTML, no headers, and lots of font elements (which clashes with their CSS). The code wasn’t generated by Macromedia Dreamweaver or Microsoft FrontPage, so that means someone hand-coded this outdated piece of work. I hope they pick up a copy of Web Standards Solutions soon.
Business Model
So how are these guys making money? Why are they paying for reviews? The most obvious answer is by referring customers to the web hosts they’ve reviewed. That’s a bit of a conflict of interest, as they’re likely to funnel customers to the best paying web hosts. This is just conjecture, of course. But the site looks untrustworthy enough for me to assume this. There are no reassurances otherwise.
However, none of the links to the web hosts contain the normal identifiers you see in affiliate links. So perhaps they have a deal where each web host combs their referrer logs to see how many customers have come from Web Hosting Pal. If that’s the case, I wonder what the overhead is in resolving click report conflicts between Web Hosting Pal and these web hosts.
My Suggestions
This review has been pretty damn critical of Web Hosting Pal. If you guys are listening, I think your product is rather sub-par right now.
But all is not lost. You have a PR4, quite a number of backlinks, and are climbing the ranks of Alexa. This means you have SEO potential, if you play your cards right.
-
Hire a professional web designer and give your site an overhaul. Make it look more professional, trustworthy, and most importantly – usable. Look through a few of Jakob Nielsen’s Alertbox columns if necessary.
-
Do some research to determine what information is critical to a user trying to decided between different web hosts. This can be as easy as sending out a survey or polling a bunch of your webmaster friends.
-
Hire a writer to rewrite your reviews and make them web-friendly. Add the writer’s name to the review to make them more authentic. Provide some credentials and information about your writer(s) too.
-
Retool your site so that it’s possible for users to search and filter their results based on the criteria that’s important to them. Organize more of your data into tables with sortable rows.
-
If you’re going to collect reviews from readers, improve your contact form so it asks for enough appropriate information to make a truly useful review.
-
Hire a professional web developer to make your site more SEO-friendly. Have this developer rewrite your HTML and CSS, build (or install) a CMS to help you efficiently publish new reviews, add a sitemap file, etc.
-
Add a way for readers to vote on each web host. Right now, it’s not clear how certain web hosts are rated as “best” while others are not. If you give your readers a way to participate with your site with ratings & reviews, you may increase its stickiness a bit (though there are always pitfalls with user participation).
-
Put together a content acquisition plan. This can include #3, where you hire more writers. Or it could be a section of your marketing plan where you aim to get more user-submitted reviews.
-
Put together a marketing plan. The beginner’s guide is a good place for customer acquisition via SEO, since it’s a content-rich section. You can also do things like ReviewMe (which you’re doing already), , link trading with other web host directories (which you’re doing already too), search engine marketing (SEM), social media marketing, etc.
-
Put together an internal dashboard to organize and measure all of your outgoing links (which hopefully are affiliate links that are generating income for you) and clickthrough paths throughout your site.
-
Once you start sending significant customer traffic to your web hosts, negotiate for better rates with them. Even an increase in a few cents could mean a nice chunk of change.
Good luck, Web Hosting Pal!
JHC! Experiment? Are you intentionally inviting a law suit? You have just verbally assulated one of your affiliate competitors for the sake of promoting DreamHost. I tried this tactic once myself in a completely non-related niche and it landed me in hot water with the company I was advertising. The company I was dissing turned me in to the one I was advertising. They said they didn’t want me promoting their business with such hostile animosity towards the other company and they threatened to delete my affiliate account. This is a bad, bad way to promote DreamHost and it’s a piss poor way to show off your SEO knowledge.
If you want to post a review of a web hosting company you’ve had first hand crappy experience with, that’s different, but to blast someone else’s site because it’s not pretty enough or isn’t giving comprehensive reviews, that’s just uncalled for. The guy may actually be making some decent money if he’s ranking is so high.
My cheesy little web hosting review site is earning me thousands of dollars a month, but I’ll be go to hell if I’ll mention my URL just so you can rip me a new one over it.
By the way, I found your site because it came across Google Alerts. Hundreds, if not, thousands of others may see this, too.
Thanks for the feedback, Rolly! Quite a nerve I touched there, huh? You’re not a part of Web Hosting Pal, are you?
I’ll buy that promoting DreamHost in this review can be seen as bad form – my bad. I’d go back and erase it, but that would be in even poorer form.
But I disagree that this is a verbal assault. It’s a frank review, albeit a harsh & critical one. But they signed up for it on ReviewMe, for better or worse. There was no way I could honestly review that site and not say anything negative about it.
If he’s making decent money – dude, I would totally tip my hat to him and wish him all the best! Hell, he could be sitting there right now, in his comfy leather chair, smoking a cigar, and laughing at this little review as the affiliate dollars roll in.
And perhaps I’m being naive here, but how are they an affiliate competitor? You mean a competitor of me? Or of DreamHost? Or of ReviewMe? I don’t quite follow here.
Oh, and wow, this was on Google Alerts?! Hot damn!
They asked for it? Well then, looks like I’ve got egg on my face and I’ll be the first to publically admit it! I’ve never heard of ReviewMe. I did the ol’ thermal retinal scan of their homepage and it looked “social networking” so I got out of there. But, you learn something new every day. What a knee-jerk reaction on my part.
Yes, you were in Google Alerts. I see tons of good and not so good come thru there. I thought you were writing just for the sake of b*tching about something. There’s a lot of that.
Affiliate competitor: By that I meant, the other site is promoting web hosting and if you’re promoting DreamHost, then you’re competitors, but like I said, I thought you were slinging dirt just to get a plug in for DreamHost and it seemed a dirty way to do it. Don’t know what ReviewMe’s rules are on that. Might want to check on your other affiliate plugs, too. LOL Nice try. LMAO You did a great job of getting them in there. LMMFAO Sorry, but the more I think about it, the funnier it is. ROTFLMMFAO!!!
So, if Web Hosting Pal asked for it, then you gave them constructive information.
Man, what a 180 I did, but I still wouldn’t give you my URL. Hope you get your coffee money. Cheers, dude.
Hehe, no worries. Fortunately, ReviewMe is okay with the other affiliate plugs.
Mo’ money, mo’ money, mo’ money!
Thanks for the feedback. We purchased web hosting pal a few months back. That’s why the info and design are out of date. The reviewme posts are just that, reviews of the site. We are using this information as feedback on how to improve webhostingpal.com. You will be seeing a very different site in the coming months and we appreciate the honest review
Ah, no wonder! Good luck with your new web property. I can’t wait to check it out again!